Verboo, Venice AI and Drael vs NotHoly for security work

Verboo, Venice AI and Drael are among the services people weigh against NotHoly when they choose a model for security work. Each one does something well. Verboo sells AI coding on a flat monthly fee. Venice AI runs a broad catalogue with chat, image, video and music, plus an API. Drael bundles one chat model with tools behind a subscription. NotHoly sells prepaid access to abliterated models for offensive security, metered per token, with the refusal direction removed from their weights as our explainer describes. The question is which of these fits a professional engagement, and where each one is built for something else.

Data collected from 9 to 11 November 2026 on Verboo's home page, API page, Terms of Use and Privacy Policy; Venice AI's plans page, API pricing, Terms of Service and privacy documentation; Drael's home page, chat documentation, limits page, tools documentation and Terms; and NotHoly's pricing and models. Prices and plans change, so check each one before you buy.

#What each service is built for

Verboo Code is a coding agent that works on a project folder on your machine. Its paid plans are Lite at US$ 20, Pro at US$ 69, Max at US$ 129 and Ultra at US$ 269 a month, and an OpenAI-compatible, pay-per-use API runs next to the subscription.

Venice AI sells subscriptions first and API access second. Its plans are built around chat, image, video and music, and its API is metered on top of a monthly plan. Some of the open base models it serves are also served by NotHoly, which makes it the most direct comparison on price.

Drael sells a subscription to one chat model, drael-v1, with code execution, page fetching and breach lookups running on its own server.

NotHoly sells prepaid credit for abliterated models, aimed at pentest, bug bounty, red team, reverse engineering and malware analysis. Each model lists its base and context window, and the command-line client runs commands on your own machine after you approve each one.

#Side by side on the points that decide a security workflow

Cells that say "not in our sources" are open because the pages we read do not state them.

Area	Verboo	Venice AI	Drael	NotHoly
Billing	Monthly plans, US$ 20 to US$ 269	Monthly plans, US$ 0 to US$ 200, API metered on top	Four-week or annual block, extra usage metered	Prepaid credit, metered per token, no subscription
Lowest API entry	Pay-per-use from a prepaid balance	Metered on top of a plan, Pro at US$ 18 a month	R$ 199 or US$ 70 for four weeks	US$ 5 top-up, credit does not expire
"Unlimited"	Max and Ultra sold as unlimited tokens	Monthly credits; API always metered	Volume "within fair use"	No unlimited claim; you pay for tokens used
Throughput	Stamina reserve slows responses under load	Not in our sources	Per-minute rate not published	Per-key rate limits set in the console
API format	OpenAI-compatible	Not in our sources	OpenAI-compatible	OpenAI and Anthropic compatible
Models and bases	Coding models; context window not published	Shared open bases, some abliterated, some original alignment	One alias, drael-v1, weights not identified	Abliterated models, base and context on the models page
Commercial use	Individual plans are for personal use	Licence for personal, non-commercial use	Not in our sources	Commercial use allowed
Seller named in terms	Verbeux Serviços LTDA, with CNPJ and address	Not in our sources	Only "the operator"	NotHoly, with CNPJ, governing law and venue
Where tools run	On your project folder	Not in our sources	On Drael's server	On your machine through the CLI, after approval
Data handling	Zero retention on ZDR models; standard retention varies by model	Privacy docs say to assume some third-party providers store content	Not in our sources	API content not stored, metadata only; chat saved unless ephemeral
Team accounts	Not in our sources	Not in our sources	Nothing in public docs	Organizations, roles, workspaces and audit log

#Billing: a flat fee, a monthly credit or a meter

Verboo sells its top two plans as unlimited tokens for a fixed monthly price. Clause 8 of its Terms of Use (version 2.4, dated 30 September 2026) says unlimited does not mean unlimited compute, uninterrupted availability or guaranteed speed. The site describes a stamina reserve that slows responses as use grows, and clauses 8.1 and 20 allow queuing, tier-based prioritization and rate limits. The price is fixed and the speed is the variable. A developer whose workload fits inside that reserve can plan around it, and unlimited plans vs metered pricing works through a real workload.

Venice's monthly plans include an API credit that does not go far. Pro is US$ 18 a month with 100 credits, or US$ 1 of API use, and it does not bank unused credit. Pro Plus at US$ 68 and Max at US$ 200 keep unused credit for two and three months. Beyond that, the API is billed per token at published rates. On GLM 5.3 those are US$ 1.75 input and US$ 5.50 output per million tokens.

Drael's API starts with a four-week block at R$ 199 or US$ 70, and its plan description promises volume "within fair use". It does not publish a per-minute rate.

NotHoly has no block and no plan. You top up from US$ 5, pay per token at the rate on pricing, and the credit does not expire. Top-ups are US$ 5, 10, 50, 500 (5% off) or 1,250 (10% off), by card or crypto. A month with no work costs nothing.

#Licence and seller: who is on the contract

Venice's Terms of Service, section 7.1, license the service for personal, non-commercial use. Paid work for a client is commercial, so ask Venice in writing if your engagement needs more. Section 7.3 lets it revoke API keys at any time, with or without notice, so a fixed test window should have a fallback.

Verboo's individual plans are for personal use, and a product that runs a third-party backend on Verboo needs a pay-per-use or enterprise plan. Its terms list malware, phishing and intrusion among prohibited uses (clause 17).

Drael's terms call the seller "the operator" and give no company name, registration, address, governing law or venue. They also make the user responsible for third-party claims that arise from use. NotHoly's terms name the company by CNPJ, with governing law and venue, and allow commercial use. A client's counsel will ask who is on the other side of the contract.

#Models, bases and refusals

NotHoly publishes the base and context window of each model on models, so you can check what you are reporting on. NotHoly does not train the base models, and they can still err or refuse.

Venice serves GLM 5.3 and GLM 5.3 Flash with the publisher's original alignment, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 from a source tagged abliterated. It also lists two abliterated models resold from a third party whose base is not stated, and its own branded model is a fine-tune. Abliterated vs uncensored models explains why those are different things.

Drael's drael-v1 is one public alias. Its chat documentation describes it as a public alias over weights the operator can change, and it does not say what those weights are. An unknown model ID gets the same alias, and the limits page says a system prompt is added that users do not see.

#Where each fits

Verboo fits a developer who wants one flat monthly bill for AI coding and can work inside a speed reserve. Venice fits personal use of a large catalogue with chat, image, video and music. Drael fits anyone who wants one chat model with its tools included in one subscription.

NotHoly fits paid offensive-security work on abliterated models: metered per token, a named company in the terms, commercial use allowed, OpenAI and Anthropic API formats, and bases you can read. API content is not stored, only metadata. NotHoly makes no images, video or music and takes no Pix. It has no published DPA, SOC 2 or ISO 27001, so a client who needs one should ask first through the enterprise page.

#Frequently asked questions

#How much does Verboo cost?

The plans are US$ 20 (Lite), US$ 69 (Pro), US$ 129 (Max) and US$ 269 (Ultra) a month on the catalogue shown on 11 November 2026. An annual toggle exists, but we did not capture the annual prices.

#Does Venice AI have abliterated models?

Some. It serves DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 from a source tagged abliterated and lists two abliterated models resold from a third party. Its own branded model is a fine-tune. We set out the two services side by side in Venice AI vs NotHoly.

#Who is behind Drael?

Its terms call the seller "the operator" and name no company, registration or address. NotHoly's terms name the company by CNPJ, with governing law and venue. Our comparison of the two is in Drael vs NotHoly.

#Which one fits pentest work under a contract?

Decide from the contract. Read the licence and the seller's terms, check where the tools run, and check the base of every model you will report on. NotHoly is built for that work. Start with US$ 5 on pricing, or read about pentesting.

#Verdict

Verboo sells a fixed monthly price, and its own terms say speed is not guaranteed. Venice AI is a broad consumer catalogue with monthly credit and a personal-use licence. Drael bundles one chat model and its tools into a subscription, under a seller its terms do not name. NotHoly meters abliterated models per token, names its company in the terms, allows commercial use, publishes the base and context of each model, and its server tools read public pages without scanning or exploiting third-party targets. For professional work under a contract, those points decide the choice. Test your own workload before you commit, and add US$ 5 on pricing to start on NotHoly.